![]() We have no evidence to suggest that anything significant from the dossier has been verified. ![]() Journalists who are friendly with Fusion GPS and opponents of the Trump administration claim, without any evidence of any kind beyond anonymous sources’ vague say-so, that the dossier has parts that were “verified.” That could mean something as simple as the parts about Russia trying to find information about Trump, or about Trump affiliates having friendly business relations with Russians. 3) The dossier is chock full of discredited information intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.Īfter that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. But as the Washington Post itself reports, the dossier did not exist until after the Democrats hired Fusion GPS: Fusion GPS claimed to reporters (though they did not provide evidence) that a Republican funded separate opposition research on Trump, dealing with his business interests. There is no evidence that a Republican donor or Republican campaign was ever involved with the Russian dossier. And Tapper took the tweet down when the error was pointed out. They also claimed it was initially funded by a Republican. When the news broke that the Clinton campaign and the DNC were admitting partial responsibility for the Russia dossier, journalists acted like they’d presented it as a Clinton campaign operation all along. Source A-to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier-was ‘a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.’ Source B was ‘a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.’ 2) No, the Russian dossier was not initially funded by Republicans
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |